Dr. Gina Lontoc

Contact information

Name: Dr. Gina Lontoc
Country: Philippines
Need full access? Please login or create an account. Registration is quick and easy. Register

Not a member yet? If you are a researcher in Global Education, consider signing up.

About

Member type: Early career researcher
Organisation: University of Santo Tomas
Topics of most interest: Global Education as a whole, Development education, Gender education, Multi- Intercultural, anti-racist education, Social justice education, Sustainable development education
Types of education of most interest: Secondary, Higher education, Adult education, Comparative education, Non formal education, Youth work and direct engagement of young people
Preference for research approach: Empirical research, Comparative research
Preference for research focusing on: Curriculum, Pedagogy, Policy
Recent publications:

Lontoc, G, (2017). "Transcribing language, translating culture?: Transcription convention and issues on translation in educational research". in Robinson-Pant, A. & A. Wolf. The Routledge Guide to Researching Across Languages and Cultures: Doing research inter-culturally. London: Routledge
 
Lontoc, G. (2016). Bridging the Gap Project final report. [Online] Available from: http://baice.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/FINAL_Bridging-the-Gap- Final-Report_February-2016-2.pdf
 
 Lontoc, G. (2014). Transcribing, translating and (re)constructing identities: the great cultural divide between us and them. CARE Working Paper (1) pp. 35-46, University of East Anglia

ANGEL Network,
Development Education Research Centre (DERC)
UCL Institute of Education
LIDC Building, 36 Gordon Square
London WC1H 0PD

Partner organisations

Carousel image attribution: "panoramio (2525)" by William “Patrick” Ma. Under CC 3.0

The establishment of this network and website has been made possible with funding support from the European Commission.
The activities and publications of the network are the responsibilities of the organisers, the Development Education Research Centre, and can in no way be seen as reflecting the views of the European Commission.