Partner organisations
Carousel image attribution: "panoramio (2525)" by William “Patrick” Ma. Under CC 3.0
Dr. Eric King-man Chong
Contact information
Name: Dr. Eric King-man Chong
Country: Hong Kong
Not a member yet? If you are a researcher in Global Education, consider signing up.
About
Member type: Specialist member
Organisation: Department of Social Sciences, The Education University of Hong Kong
Topics of most interest: Global Education as a whole, Citizenship education , Development education, Human rights education, Peace education, Social justice education
Types of education of most interest: Primary, Secondary, Higher education, Comparative education, Non formal education, Youth work and direct engagement of young people
Preference for research approach: Theoretical / conceptual research, Empirical research, Comparative research
Preference for research focusing on: Curriculum, Pedagogy, Policy, Teacher education
Online publishing profile or ORCID code:
Recent publications:
Eric King-man Chong (2020). Reinstating Global Citizenship Education: Conceptual, Curricular, and Pedagogical Considerations in Hong Kong’s Curriculum and School Teaching. John P. Myers, Research on Teaching Global Issues: Pedagogy for Global Citizenship Education. Charlotte, NC: IAP – Information Age Publishing, Inc.
Eric Kingman Chong, Edda Sant & Ian Davies (2019). Civic education guidelines in Hong Kong 1985-2012: Striving for normative stability in turbulent social and political contexts, Theory & Research in Social Education,
DOI: 10.1080/00933104.2019.1676854.
Chong, E.K.M. (2015). Global Citizenship Education of Hong Kong secondary school curriculum guidelines: From understanding responsibility to challenging injustice. Asian Education and Development Studies, 4(2): 221-247.
The establishment of this network and website has been made possible with funding support from the European Commission.
The activities and publications of the network are the responsibilities of the organisers, the Development Education Research Centre, and can in no way be seen as reflecting the views of the European Commission.